Difference between MEAN.js and MEAN.io
I wanted to use the MEAN JavaScript Stack, but I noticed that there are two different stacks with either their own website and installation methods: mean.js and mean.io. So I came up asking myself this question: "Which one do I use?".
So in order to answer this question I ask the community if you could explain what are the differences between these two? And if possible pros and cons? Because they look very similar to me.
They're essentially the same... They both use swig for templating, they both use karma and mocha for tests, passport integration, nodemon, etc.
Why so similar? Mean.js is a fork of Mean.io and both initiatives were started by the same guy... Mean.io is now under the umbrella of the company Linnovate and looks like the guy (Amos Haviv) stopped his collaboration with this company and started Mean.js. You can read more about the reasons here.
Now... main (or little) differences you can see right now are:
SCAFFOLDING AND BOILERPLATE GENERATION
Mean.io uses a custom cli tool named 'mean'
Mean.js uses Yeoman Generators
MODULARITY
Mean.io uses a more self-contained node packages modularity with client and server files inside the modules.
Mean.js uses modules just in the front-end (for angular), and connects them with Express. Although they were working on vertical modules as well...
BUILD SYSTEM
Mean.io has recently moved to gulp
Mean.js uses grunt
DEPLOYMENT
Both have Dockerfiles in their respective repos, and Mean.io has one-click install on Google Compute Engine, while Mean.js can also be deployed with one-click install on Digital Ocean.
DOCUMENTATION
Mean.io has ok docs
Mean.js has AWESOME docs
COMMUNITY
Mean.io has a bigger community since it was the original boilerplate
Mean.js has less momentum but steady growth
On a personal level, I like more the philosophy and openness of MeanJS and more the traction and modules/packages approach of MeanIO. Both are nice, and you'll end probably modifying them, so you can't really go wrong picking one or the other. Just take them as starting point and as a learning exercise.
ALTERNATIVE “MEAN” SOLUTIONS
MEAN is a generic way (coined by Valeri Karpov) to describe a boilerplate/framework that takes "Mongo + Express + Angular + Node" as the base of the stack. You can find frameworks with this stack that use other denomination, some of them really good for RAD (Rapid Application Development) and building SPAs. Eg:
You also have Hackathon Starter. It doesn't have A of MEAN (it is 'MEN'), but it rocks..
Have fun!
First of all, MEAN is an acronym for M ongoDB, E xpress, A ngular and N ode.js.
It generically identifies the combined used of these technologies in a "stack". There is no such a thing as "The MEAN framework".
Lior Kesos at Linnovate took advantage of this confusion. He bought the domain MEAN.io and put some code at https://github.com/linnovate/mean
They luckily received a lot of publicity, and theree are more and more articles and video about MEAN. When you Google "mean framework", mean.io is the first in the list.
Unfortunately the code at https://github.com/linnovate/mean seems poorly engineered.
In February I fell in the trap myself. The site mean.io had a catchy design and the Github repo had 1000+ stars. The idea of questioning the quality did not even pass through my mind. I started experimenting with it but it did not take too long to stumble upon things that were not working, and puzzling pieces of code.
The commit history was also pretty concerning. They re-engineered the code and directory structure multiple times, and merging the new changes is too time consuming.
The nice things about both mean.io and mean.js code is that they come with Bootstrap integration. They also come with Facebook, Github, Linkedin etc authentication through PassportJs and an example of a model (Article) on the backend on MongoDB that sync with the frontend model with AngularJS.
According to Linnovate's website:
Linnovate is the leading Open Source company in Israel, with the most experienced team in the country, dedicated to the creation of high-end open source solutions. Linnovate is the only company in Israel which gives an AZ services for enterprises for building and maintaining their next web project.
From the website it looks like that their core skill set is Drupal (a PHP content management system) and only lately they started using Node.js and AngularJS.
Lately I was reading the Mean.js Blog and things became clearer. My understanding is that the main Javascript developer (Amos Haviv) left Linnovate to work on Mean.js leaving MEAN.io project with people that are novice Node.js developers that are slowing understanding how things are supposed to work.
In the future things may change but for now I would avoid to use mean.io. If you are looking for a boilerplate for a quickstart Mean.js seems a better option than mean.io.
Here is a side-by-side comparison of several application starters/generators and other technologies including MEAN.js, MEAN.io, and cleverstack. I keep adding alternatives as I find time and as that happens, the list of potentially provided benefits keeps growing too. Today it's up to around 1600. If anyone wants to help improve its accuracy or completeness, click the next link and do a questionnaire about something you know.
Compare app technologies project
From this database, the system generates reports like the following:
MeanJS vs MeanIO trade-off report
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/13654.html下一篇: MEAN.js和MEAN.io之间的区别