Awkward way of executing JavaScript code
This question already has an answer here:
This is a poor example. Consider the following:
var a = (function(){
var ret = {};
ret.test = "123";
function imPrivate() { /* ... */ }
ret.public = function() { imPrivate(); }
return ret;
})();
a
will contain the varible test and the function public, however you can not access imPrivate. This is the common way to handle public vs private variables;
See Why is this function wrapped in parentheses, followed by parentheses? for more info.
var a = (function() {
return foo(bar);
})();
In this case this is really unnecessary, but this is not wrong and it will not throw an error.
But IIF
some times uses like module pattern
:
var a = (function() {
/* some other code in own scope */
return foo(bar);
})();
In this case IIF
is just a module
which exports something outside.
The closure function is used to encapsulate some of the attributes / methods in the function. Much like the private / public principle from other languages.
You can find more on this topic here under Module Pattern
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/1472.html上一篇: 我的JavaScript范围有什么问题?
下一篇: 执行JavaScript代码的尴尬方式