IllegalArgumentException or NullPointerException for a null parameter?
I have a simple setter method for a property and null is not appropriate for this particular property. I have always been torn in this situation: should I throw an IllegalArgumentException , or a NullPointerException ? From the javadocs, both seem appropriate. Is there some kind of an understood standard? Or is this just one of those things that you should do whatever you prefer and both are really correct?
如果你不想让null成为一个允许的值，那么就会调用IllegalArgumentException ，如果你试图使用一个变量为null的变量，就会抛出NullPointerException 。
You should be using IllegalArgumentException (IAE), not NullPointerException (NPE) for the following reasons:
First, the NPE JavaDoc explicitly lists the cases where NPE is appropriate. Notice that all of them are thrown by the runtime when null is used inappropriately. In contrast, the IAE JavaDoc couldn't be more clear: "Thrown to indicate that a method has been passed an illegal or inappropriate argument." Yup, that's you!
Second, when you see an NPE in a stack trace, what do you assume? Probably that someone dereferenced a null . When you see IAE, you assume the caller of the method at the top of the stack passed in an illegal value. Again, the latter assumption is true, the former is misleading.
Third, since IAE is clearly designed for validating parameters, you have to assume it as the default choice of exception, so why would you choose NPE instead? Certainly not for different behavior -- do you really expect calling code to catch NPE's separately from IAE and do something different as a result? Are you trying to communicate a more specific error message? But you can do that in the exception message text anyway, as you should for all other incorrect parameters.
Fourth, all other incorrect parameter data will be IAE, so why not be consistent? Why is it that an illegal null is so special that it deserves a separate exception from all other types of illegal arguments?
Finally, I accept the argument given by other answers that parts of the Java API use NPE in this manner. However, the Java API is inconsistent with everything from exception types to naming conventions, so I think just blindly copying (your favorite part of) the Java API isn't a good enough argument to trump these other considerations.
The standard is to throw the NullPointerException. The generally infallible "Effective Java" discusses this briefly in Item 42 (first edition), Item 60 (second edition), or Item 72 (third edition) "Favor the use of standard exceptions":
"Arguably, all erroneous method invocations boil down to an illegal argument or illegal state, but other exceptions are standardly used for certain kinds of illegal arguments and states. If a caller passes null in some parameter for which null values are prohibited, convention dictates that NullPointerException be thrown rather than IllegalArgumentException."
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/2130.html上一篇: 避免在Java中同步（this）？
下一篇: 对于null参数，IllegalArgumentException或NullPointerException？