What signals shouldn't be blocked by thread in multi
I have a multi-threaded program. I want to handle all meaningful signals in a single thread. That's what I do before creating any thread:
sigset_t signal_set, old_set;
sigfillset(&signal_set);
// What signals should I leave unblocked here?
pthread_sigmask(SIG_SETMASK, &signal_set, &old_set);
std::thread( /* some args */ );
pthread_sigmask(SIG_SETMASK, &old_set, nullptr);
But my good sense suggests leaving some signals unblocked, since there is a plenty of situation when signals may be sent directly to specific thread: SIGSEGV or SIGPROF - I believe, it's as good as leaving unblocked SIGINT in an interactive program.
Are my suggestions correct about those two signals ( SIGSEGV , SIGPROF )?
What other signals should I leave unblocked following some common sense?
Asynchronous signals (that's most of them, including anything sent by the kill command/function and signals generated by the controlling terminal like SIGINT ) are deliverable to any thread in the process that has the signal unblocked, so there's no need to keep them unblocked in all threads. If you're using a dedicated signal handling thread, you want them blocked in all threads except the signal handling thread.
Synchronous signals on the other hand are delivered to a particular thread as a result of an action by that thread. They include SIGPIPE , SIGBUS , SIGSEGV , SIGFPE , etc. Except for SIGPIPE , none of these should happen at all unless you have serious bugs in your program, and you probably want to block SIGPIPE anyway so you can instead get the EPIPE error and handle this condition properly. So for the most part I would say it doesn't hurt to just block them all. If you really find yourself needing to handle SIGSEGV or such, you probably should rethink the reasons, but in the mean time feel free to unblock it.
上一篇: C ++
下一篇: 什么信号不应该被多线程阻塞