Java: protected access across packages

I would like to understand what's happening in the example below (where a protected member is being accessed from outside the package through a subclass).

I know for classes outside the package, the subclass can see the protected member only through inheritance.

There are two packages: package1 and package2 .

package org.test.package1;

public class ProtectedClass {

    protected void foo () {
        System.out.println("foo");
    }
}

package org.test.package2;

import org.test.package1.ProtectedClass;

public class ExtendsprotectedClass  extends ProtectedClass {

    public void boo() {
        foo(); // This works, 
               // since protected method is visible through inheritance
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        ExtendsprotectedClass epc = new ExtendsprotectedClass();
        epc.foo(); // Why is this working? 
                   // Since it is accessed through a reference,
                   // foo() should not be visible, right?
    }
}

package org.test.package2;

public class UsesExtendedClass {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        ExtendsprotectedClass epc = new ExtendsprotectedClass();
        epc.foo(); // CompilationError: 
                   // The method foo() from the type ProtectedClass
                   // is not visible
    }
}

It is understood that the boo() method in ExtendsprotectedClass can access foo() , since protected members can be accessed through inheritance only.

My question is, why is the foo() method working fine when accessed through a reference in the main() method of ExtendsprotectedClass but will not work when accessed through the epc reference in UsesExtendedClass ?

Code within the ExtendsprotectedClass class is allowed to access protected members of ProtectedClass via a reference of type ExtendsprotectedClass . From the JLS section 6.6.2:

A protected member or constructor of an object may be accessed from outside the package in which it is declared only by code that is responsible for the implementation of that object.

and

Let C be the class in which a protected member m is declared. Access is permitted only within the body of a subclass S of C. In addition, if Id denotes an instance field or instance method, then:

UsesExtendedClass isn't reponsible for the implementation of ExtendsprotectedClass , hence the final call fails.

EDIT: The reasoning behind this is that protected access is designed to help subclasses implement the functionality they need, giving more access to the internals of the superclass than would normally be available. If that were available to all code, it would be pretty close to making the method public. Basically, the subclasses are trusted not to break encapsulation; they're given more capabilities within objects of their own type. The public API shouldn't expose those details, but the protected API can just for the purposes of giving subclasses more opportunities.

It is working in the first case because it is being called from the same class even the method is being accessed through a reference. You could even call a private method of ExtendsprotectedClass through a reference in the same main method.

I believe you've answered your own question; UsesExtendedClass does not inherit from ProtectedClass, and -- by definition -- "protected" members are accessible only in the class in which they are declared / defined or in a class that inherits from the one in which they are declared or defined.

上一篇: 子类是否继承私有字段？

下一篇: Java：跨包的受保护访问