How complete is the SQL Server 2008 deadlock graph executionStack?
When I get the deadlock graph xml in SQL Server, it shows me an executionStack for each process, eg (I have removed most of the attributes):
<process>
<executionStack>
<frame>INSERT INTO MYTABLE</frame>
<frame>INSERT INTO MYTABLE</frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>INSERT INTO MYTABLE</inputbuf>
</process>
I know the list of frames does not contain all the frames in the transaction, but does it contain all the frames that are implicated in the deadlock, so I do not need to look any further? Or do I need to also examine the preceding sql statements in the same transaction to get a complete picture as to the cause of the deadlock?
Edit: to clarify further, the following can deadlock itself if run in two separate spids:
select * from mytable where column = @arg delete from mytable where column = @arg
Will the deadlock graph show the select statement as well as the delete statement, or only the delete statement because that was the last statement in the transaction? Without seeing the select statement too, it is difficult to identify the correct fix (eg, updlock hint on the select).
You need to examine the preceding sql statements in the same transaction.
The deadlock graph just shows you the call stack for the statements executing when the deadlock occurred. The statements that actually acquired the deadlocked resources may not be present. This is easily demonstrated as follows.
Connection 1
CREATE TABLE T1
(
id INT PRIMARY KEY,
foo CHAR(100),
bar CHAR(100)
)
INSERT INTO T1
(id)
VALUES (1),
(2)
GO
BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE T1
SET foo = '123'
WHERE id = 1
WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05'
GO
UPDATE T1
SET bar = 'dlock'
WHERE id = 2
ROLLBACK
DROP TABLE T1
Connection 2 (Execute quickly after Conn 1)
BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE T1
SET foo = '123'
WHERE id = 2
WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:05'
GO
UPDATE T1
SET bar = 'dlock'
WHERE id = 1
ROLLBACK
Deadlock Graph
<process-list>
<process
id="process520d1c8"
taskpriority="0"
logused="504"
waitresource="KEY: 1:72057594051100672 (010086470766)"
waittime="3666"
ownerId="10399789"
transactionname="user_transaction"
lasttranstarted="2011-10-30T13:45:29.030"
XDES="0x4eb5be8"
lockMode="X"
schedulerid="2"
kpid="8656"
status="suspended"
spid="59"
sbid="0"
ecid="0"
priority="0"
trancount="2"
lastbatchstarted="2011-10-30T13:45:34.047"
lastbatchcompleted="2011-10-30T13:45:34.043"
clientapp="Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio - Query"
hostname="MyPC"
hostpid="7544"
loginname="Me"
isolationlevel="read committed (2)"
xactid="10399789"
currentdb="1"
lockTimeout="4294967295"
clientoption1="671090784"
clientoption2="390200">
<executionStack>
<frame
procname="adhoc"
line="2"
stmtstart="58"
sqlhandle="0x02000000b24eb7001f552b64e5c2bf2ccb1f2acfda154410">
UPDATE [T1] set [bar] = @1 WHERE [id]=@2
</frame>
<frame
procname="adhoc"
line="2"
stmtstart="4"
stmtend="90"
sqlhandle="0x020000002688730e96c94af4582dfb097fa79a39ea620d63">
UPDATE T1 SET bar = 'dlock' where id=1
</frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
UPDATE T1 SET bar = 'dlock' where id=1
rollback
</inputbuf>
</process>
<process
id="process370d8718"
taskpriority="0"
logused="504"
waitresource="KEY: 1:72057594051100672 (020068e8b274)"
waittime="5579"
ownerId="10399738"
transactionname="user_transaction"
lasttranstarted="2011-10-30T13:45:27.040"
XDES="0x1ef7ac10"
lockMode="X"
schedulerid="1"
kpid="2060"
status="suspended"
spid="52"
sbid="0"
ecid="0"
priority="0"
trancount="2"
lastbatchstarted="2011-10-30T13:45:32.083"
lastbatchcompleted="2011-10-30T13:45:32.043"
clientapp="Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio - Query"
hostname="MyPC"
hostpid="7544"
loginname="Me"
isolationlevel="read committed (2)"
xactid="10399738"
currentdb="1"
lockTimeout="4294967295"
clientoption1="671098976"
clientoption2="390200">
<executionStack>
<frame
procname="adhoc"
line="3"
stmtstart="58"
sqlhandle="0x02000000b24eb7001f552b64e5c2bf2ccb1f2acfda154410">
UPDATE [T1] set [bar] = @1 WHERE [id]=@2
</frame>
<frame
procname="adhoc"
line="3"
stmtstart="8"
stmtend="94"
sqlhandle="0x020000004a869b267636c00306e481791dec78ade36b3f39">
UPDATE T1 SET bar = 'dlock' where id=2
</frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
UPDATE T1 SET bar = 'dlock' where id=2
ROLLBACK
DROP TABLE T1
</inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
The assignments to column foo
that acquired the locks in the first place aren't shown.
(NB: Without the GO
statement to make the statements separate batches you would in this case see the offending statement but in general the lock acquisition might occur further down the call stack so the statement that actually acquired the locks still wouldn't be shown)
上一篇: 一个进程成为死锁受害者的原因