有没有办法让GHC提供类型孔的类型约束?
目前的行为
Prelude> show _
<interactive>:7:6:
Found hole ‘_’ with type: a0
Where: ‘a0’ is an ambiguous type variable
Relevant bindings include it :: String (bound at <interactive>:7:1)
In the first argument of ‘show’, namely ‘_’
In the expression: show _
In an equation for ‘it’: it = show _
期望的行为
如果GHC也会告诉我这个类型的孔具有Show
类的类型约束,那将会很好。
杂项
GHC版本7.8.1
现在由于DominiqueDevriese的GHC票证,现在已经在GHC 8.0中修复了。
由于扩展类型违约,这在GHCi中并不明显。 以你为例,
> show _
<interactive>:7:6: error:
• Found hole: _h :: ()
Or perhaps ‘_h’ is mis-spelled, or not in scope
• In the first argument of ‘show’, namely ‘_h’
In the expression: show _h
In an equation for ‘it’: it = show _h
• Relevant bindings include
it :: String (bound at <interactive>:7:1)
孔的类型默认为()
。 这显然是期望的行为,尽管有一个论点需要做出延期违约不应该适用于漏洞(因为他们通常使用的是让编译器告诉你推断的类型)。
不过,如果您使用GHC进行编译或在GHCi中禁用扩展默认规则(通过:set -XNoExtendedDefaultRules
),我们可以看到改进的结果:
<interactive>:3:1: error:
• Ambiguous type variable ‘a0’ arising from a use of ‘show’
prevents the constraint ‘(Show a0)’ from being solved.
Probable fix: use a type annotation to specify what ‘a0’ should be.
These potential instances exist:
instance Show Ordering -- Defined in ‘GHC.Show’
instance Show Integer -- Defined in ‘GHC.Show’
instance Show a => Show (Maybe a) -- Defined in ‘GHC.Show’
...plus 22 others
...plus 11 instances involving out-of-scope types
(use -fprint-potential-instances to see them all)
• In the expression: show _
In an equation for ‘it’: it = show _
<interactive>:3:6: error:
• Found hole: _ :: a0
Where: ‘a0’ is an ambiguous type variable
• In the first argument of ‘show’, namely ‘_’
In the expression: show _
In an equation for ‘it’: it = show _
• Relevant bindings include
it :: String (bound at <interactive>:3:1)
目前没有这种可能。但根据推测它可能会被添加到GHC。
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/33209.html上一篇: Is there a way to make GHC provide the type class constraints of typed holes?
下一篇: Debugging compile time performance issues caused by GHC's constraint solver