How do I return the response from an asynchronous call?
I have a function foo which makes an Ajax request. How can I return the response from foo ?
I tried returning the value from the success callback as well as assigning the response to a local variable inside the function and returning that one, but none of those ways actually return the response.
function foo() {
var result;
$.ajax({
url: '...',
success: function(response) {
result = response;
// return response; // <- I tried that one as well
}
});
return result;
}
var result = foo(); // It always ends up being `undefined`.
-> For a more general explanation of async behaviour with different examples, please see Why is my variable unaltered after I modify it inside of a function? - Asynchronous code reference
-> If you already understand the problem, skip to the possible solutions below.
The problem
The A in Ajax stands for asynchronous . That means sending the request (or rather receiving the response) is taken out of the normal execution flow. In your example, $.ajax returns immediately and the next statement, return result; , is executed before the function you passed as success callback was even called.
Here is an analogy which hopefully makes the difference between synchronous and asynchronous flow clearer:
Synchronous
Imagine you make a phone call to a friend and ask him to look something up for you. Although it might take a while, you wait on the phone and stare into space, until your friend gives you the answer that you needed.
The same is happening when you make a function call containing "normal" code:
function findItem() {
var item;
while(item_not_found) {
// search
}
return item;
}
var item = findItem();
// Do something with item
doSomethingElse();
Even though findItem might take a long time to execute, any code coming after var item = findItem(); has to wait until the function returns the result.
Asynchronous
You call your friend again for the same reason. But this time you tell him that you are in a hurry and he should call you back on your mobile phone. You hang up, leave the house and do whatever you planned to do. Once your friend calls you back, you are dealing with the information he gave to you.
That's exactly what's happening when you do an Ajax request.
findItem(function(item) {
// Do something with item
});
doSomethingElse();
Instead of waiting for the response, the execution continues immediately and the statement after the Ajax call is executed. To get the response eventually, you provide a function to be called once the response was received, a callback (notice something? call back ?). Any statement coming after that call is executed before the callback is called.
Solution(s)
Embrace the asynchronous nature of JavaScript! While certain asynchronous operations provide synchronous counterparts (so does "Ajax"), it's generally discouraged to use them, especially in a browser context.
Why is it bad do you ask?
JavaScript runs in the UI thread of the browser and any long running process will lock the UI, making it unresponsive. Additionally, there is an upper limit on the execution time for JavaScript and the browser will ask the user whether to continue the execution or not.
All of this is really bad user experience. The user won't be able to tell whether everything is working fine or not. Furthermore, the effect will be worse for users with a slow connection.
In the following we will look at three different solutions that are all building on top of each other:
async/await (ES2017+, available in older browsers if you use a transpiler or regenerator) then() (ES2015+, available in older browsers if you use one of the many promise libraries) All three are available in current browsers, and node 7+.
ES2017+: Promises with async/await
The new ECMAScript version released in 2017 introduced syntax-level support for asynchronous functions. With the help of async and await , you can write asynchronous in a "synchronous style". Make no mistake though: The code is still asynchronous, but it's easier to read/understand.
async/await builds on top of promises: an async function always returns a promise. await "unwraps" a promise and either result in the value the promise was resolved with or throws an error if the promise was rejected.
Important: You can only use await inside an async function. That means that at the very top level, you still have to work directly with the promise.
You can read more about async and await on MDN.
Here is an example that builds on top of delay above:
// Using 'superagent' which will return a promise.
var superagent = require('superagent')
// This is isn't declared as `async` because it already returns a promise
function delay() {
// `delay` returns a promise
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
// Only `delay` is able to resolve or reject the promise
setTimeout(function() {
resolve(42); // After 3 seconds, resolve the promise with value 42
}, 3000);
});
}
async function getAllBooks() {
try {
// GET a list of book IDs of the current user
var bookIDs = await superagent.get('/user/books');
// wait for a second (just for the sake of this example)
await delay(1000);
// GET information about each book
return await superagent.get('/books/ids='+JSON.stringify(bookIDs));
} catch(error) {
// If any of the awaited promises was rejected, this catch block
// would catch the rejection reason
return null;
}
}
// Async functions always return a promise
getAllBooks()
.then(function(books) {
console.log(books);
});
Newer browser and node versions support async/await . You can also support older environments by transforming your code to ES5 with the help of regenerator (or tools that use regenerator, such as Babel).
Let functions accept callbacks
A callback is simply a function passed to another function. That other function can call the function passed whenever it is ready. In the context of an asynchronous process, the callback will be called whenever the asynchronous process is done. Usually, the result is passed to the callback.
In the example of the question, you can make foo accept a callback and use it as success callback. So this
var result = foo();
// Code that depends on 'result'
becomes
foo(function(result) {
// Code that depends on 'result'
});
Here we defined the function "inline" but you can pass any function reference:
function myCallback(result) {
// Code that depends on 'result'
}
foo(myCallback);
foo itself is defined as follows:
function foo(callback) {
$.ajax({
// ...
success: callback
});
}
callback will refer to the function we pass to foo when we call it and we simply pass it on to success . Ie once the Ajax request is successful, $.ajax will call callback and pass the response to the callback (which can be referred to with result , since this is how we defined the callback).
You can also process the response before passing it to the callback:
function foo(callback) {
$.ajax({
// ...
success: function(response) {
// For example, filter the response
callback(filtered_response);
}
});
}
It's easier to write code using callbacks than it may seem. After all, JavaScript in the browser is heavily event-driven (DOM events). Receiving the Ajax response is nothing else but an event.
Difficulties could arise when you have to work with third-party code, but most problems can be solved by just thinking through the application flow.
ES2015+: Promises with then()
The Promise API is a new feature of ECMAScript 6 (ES2015), but it has good browser support already. There are also many libraries which implement the standard Promises API and provide additional methods to ease the use and composition of asynchronous functions (eg bluebird).
Promises are containers for future values. When the promise receives the value (it is resolved) or when it is cancelled (rejected), it notifies all of its "listeners" who want to access this value.
The advantage over plain callbacks is that they allow you to decouple your code and they are easier to compose.
Here is a simple example of using a promise:
function delay() {
// `delay` returns a promise
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
// Only `delay` is able to resolve or reject the promise
setTimeout(function() {
resolve(42); // After 3 seconds, resolve the promise with value 42
}, 3000);
});
}
delay()
.then(function(v) { // `delay` returns a promise
console.log(v); // Log the value once it is resolved
})
.catch(function(v) {
// Or do something else if it is rejected
// (it would not happen in this example, since `reject` is not called).
});
Applied to our Ajax call we could use promises like this:
function ajax(url) {
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.onload = function() {
resolve(this.responseText);
};
xhr.onerror = reject;
xhr.open('GET', url);
xhr.send();
});
}
ajax("/echo/json")
.then(function(result) {
// Code depending on result
})
.catch(function() {
// An error occurred
});
Describing all the advantages that promise offer is beyond the scope of this answer, but if you write new code, you should seriously consider them. They provide a great abstraction and separation of your code.
More information about promises: HTML5 rocks - JavaScript Promises
Side note: jQuery's deferred objects
Deferred objects are jQuery's custom implementation of promises (before the Promise API was standardized). They behave almost like promises but expose a slightly different API.
Every Ajax method of jQuery already returns a "deferred object" (actually a promise of a deferred object) which you can just return from your function:
function ajax() {
return $.ajax(...);
}
ajax().done(function(result) {
// Code depending on result
}).fail(function() {
// An error occurred
});
Side note: Promise gotchas
Keep in mind that promises and deferred objects are just containers for a future value, they are not the value itself. For example, suppose you had the following:
function checkPassword() {
return $.ajax({
url: '/password',
data: {
username: $('#username').val(),
password: $('#password').val()
},
type: 'POST',
dataType: 'json'
});
}
if (checkPassword()) {
// Tell the user they're logged in
}
This code misunderstands the above asynchrony issues. Specifically, $.ajax() doesn't freeze the code while it checks the '/password' page on your server - it sends a request to the server and while it waits, immediately returns a jQuery Ajax Deferred object, not the response from the server. That means the if statement is going to always get this Deferred object, treat it as true , and proceed as though the user is logged in. Not good.
But the fix is easy:
checkPassword()
.done(function(r) {
if (r) {
// Tell the user they're logged in
} else {
// Tell the user their password was bad
}
})
.fail(function(x) {
// Tell the user something bad happened
});
Not recommended: Synchronous "Ajax" calls
As I mentioned, some(!) asynchronous operations have synchronous counterparts. I don't advocate their use, but for completeness' sake, here is how you would perform a synchronous call:
Without jQuery
If you directly use a XMLHTTPRequest object, pass false as third argument to .open .
jQuery
If you use jQuery, you can set the async option to false . Note that this option is deprecated since jQuery 1.8. You can then either still use a success callback or access the responseText property of the jqXHR object:
function foo() {
var jqXHR = $.ajax({
//...
async: false
});
return jqXHR.responseText;
}
If you use any other jQuery Ajax method, such as $.get , $.getJSON , etc., you have to change it to $.ajax (since you can only pass configuration parameters to $.ajax ).
Heads up! It is not possible to make a synchronous JSONP request. JSONP by its very nature is always asynchronous (one more reason to not even consider this option).
If you're not using jQuery in your code, this answer is for you
Your code should be something along the lines of this:
function foo() {
var httpRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
httpRequest.open('GET', "/echo/json");
httpRequest.send();
return httpRequest.responseText;
}
var result = foo(); // always ends up being 'undefined'
Felix Kling did a fine job writing an answer for people using jQuery for AJAX, I've decided to provide an alternative for people who aren't.
(Note, for those using the new fetch API, Angular or promises I've added another answer below)
What you're facing
This is a short summary of "Explanation of the problem" from the other answer, if you're not sure after reading this, read that.
The A in AJAX stands for asynchronous . That means sending the request (or rather receiving the response) is taken out of the normal execution flow. In your example, .send returns immediately and the next statement, return result; , is executed before the function you passed as success callback was even called.
This means when you're returning, the listener you've defined did not execute yet, which means the value you're returning has not been defined.
Here is a simple analogy
function getFive(){
var a;
setTimeout(function(){
a=5;
},10);
return a;
}
(Fiddle)
The value of a returned is undefined since the a=5 part has not executed yet. AJAX acts like this, you're returning the value before the server got the chance to tell your browser what that value is.
One possible solution to this problem is to code re-actively , telling your program what to do when the calculation completed.
function onComplete(a){ // When the code completes, do this
alert(a);
}
function getFive(whenDone){
var a;
setTimeout(function(){
a=5;
whenDone(a);
},10);
}
This is called CPS. Basically, we're passing getFive an action to perform when it completes, we're telling our code how to react when an event completes (like our AJAX call, or in this case the timeout).
Usage would be:
getFive(onComplete);
Which should alert "5" to the screen. (Fiddle).
Possible solutions
There are basically two ways how to solve this:
1. Synchronous AJAX - Don't do it!!
As for synchronous AJAX, don't do it! Felix's answer raises some compelling arguments about why it's a bad idea. To sum it up, it'll freeze the user's browser until the server returns the response and create a very bad user experience. Here is another short summary taken from MDN on why:
XMLHttpRequest supports both synchronous and asynchronous communications. In general, however, asynchronous requests should be preferred to synchronous requests for performance reasons.
In short, synchronous requests block the execution of code... ...this can cause serious issues...
If you have to do it, you can pass a flag: Here is how:
var request = new XMLHttpRequest();
request.open('GET', 'yourURL', false); // `false` makes the request synchronous
request.send(null);
if (request.status === 200) {// That's HTTP for 'ok'
console.log(request.responseText);
}
2. Restructure code
Let your function accept a callback. In the example code foo can be made to accept a callback. We'll be telling our code how to react when foo completes.
So:
var result = foo();
// code that depends on `result` goes here
Becomes:
foo(function(result) {
// code that depends on `result`
});
Here we passed an anonymous function, but we could just as easily pass a reference to an existing function, making it look like:
function myHandler(result) {
// code that depends on `result`
}
foo(myHandler);
For more details on how this sort of callback design is done, check Felix's answer.
Now, let's define foo itself to act accordingly
function foo(callback) {
var httpRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
httpRequest.onload = function(){ // when the request is loaded
callback(httpRequest.responseText);// we're calling our method
};
httpRequest.open('GET', "/echo/json");
httpRequest.send();
}
(fiddle)
We have now made our foo function accept an action to run when the AJAX completes successfully, we can extend this further by checking if the response status is not 200 and acting accordingly (create a fail handler and such). Effectively solving our issue.
If you're still having a hard time understanding this read the AJAX getting started guide at MDN.
XMLHttpRequest 2 (first of all read the answers from Benjamin Gruenbaum & Felix Kling)
If you don't use jQuery and want a nice short XMLHttpRequest 2 which works on the modern browsers and also on the mobile browsers I suggest to use it this way:
function ajax(a, b, c){ // URL, callback, just a placeholder
c = new XMLHttpRequest;
c.open('GET', a);
c.onload = b;
c.send()
}
As you can see:
There are two ways to get the response of this Ajax call (three using the XMLHttpRequest var name):
The simplest:
this.response
Or if for some reason you bind() the callback to a class:
e.target.response
Example:
function callback(e){
console.log(this.response);
}
ajax('URL', callback);
Or (the above one is better anonymous functions are always a problem):
ajax('URL', function(e){console.log(this.response)});
Nothing easier.
Now some people will probably say that it's better to use onreadystatechange or the even the XMLHttpRequest variable name. That's wrong.
Check out XMLHttpRequest advanced features
It supported on all *modern browsers. And I can confirm as I'm using this approach since XMLHttpRequest 2 exists. I never had any type of problem on all browsers I use.
onreadystatechange is only useful if you want to get the headers on state 2.
Using the XMLHttpRequest variable name is another big error as you need to execute the callback inside the onload/oreadystatechange closures else you lost it.
Now if you want something more complex using post and FormData you can easily extend this function:
function x(a, b, e, d, c){ // URL, callback, method, formdata or {key:val},placeholder
c = new XMLHttpRequest;
c.open(e||'get', a);
c.onload = b;
c.send(d||null)
}
Again ... it's a very short function, but it does get & post.
Examples of usage:
x(url, callback); // By default it's get so no need to set
x(url, callback, 'post', {'key': 'val'}); // No need to set post data
Or pass a full form element ( document.getElementsByTagName('form')[0] ):
var fd = new FormData(form);
x(url, callback, 'post', fd);
Or set some custom values:
var fd = new FormData();
fd.append('key', 'val')
x(url, callback, 'post', fd);
As you can see I didn't implement sync... it's a bad thing.
Having said that ... why don't do it the easy way?
As mentioned in the comment the use of error && synchronous does completely break the point of the answer. Which is a nice short way to use Ajax in the proper way?
Error handler
function x(a, b, e, d, c){ // URL, callback, method, formdata or {key:val}, placeholder
c = new XMLHttpRequest;
c.open(e||'get', a);
c.onload = b;
c.onerror = error;
c.send(d||null)
}
function error(e){
console.log('--Error--', this.type);
console.log('this: ', this);
console.log('Event: ', e)
}
function displayAjax(e){
console.log(e, this);
}
x('WRONGURL', displayAjax);
In the above script, you have an error handler which is statically defined so it does not compromise the function. The error handler can be used for other functions too.
But to really get out an error the only way is to write a wrong URL in which case every browser throws an error.
Error handlers are maybe useful if you set custom headers, set the responseType to blob array buffer or whatever....
Even if you pass 'POSTAPAPAP' as the method it won't throw an error.
Even if you pass 'fdggdgilfdghfldj' as formdata it won't throw an error.
In the first case the error is inside the displayAjax() under this.statusText as Method not Allowed .
In the second case, it simply works. You have to check at the server side if you passed the right post data.
cross-domain not allowed throws error automatically.
In the error response, there are no error codes.
There is only the this.type which is set to error.
Why add an error handler if you totally have no control over errors? Most of the errors are returned inside this in the callback function displayAjax() .
So: No need for error checks if you're able to copy and paste the URL properly. ;)
PS: As the first test I wrote x('x', displayAjax)..., and it totally got a response...??? So I checked the folder where the HTML is located, and there was a file called 'x.xml'. So even if you forget the extension of your file XMLHttpRequest 2 WILL FIND IT. I LOL'd
Read a file synchronous
Don't do that.
If you want to block the browser for a while load a nice big txt file synchronous.
function omg(a, c){ // URL
c = new XMLHttpRequest;
c.open('GET', a, true);
c.send();
return c; // Or c.response
}
Now you can do
var res = omg('thisIsGonnaBlockThePage.txt');
There is no other way to do this in a non-asynchronous way. (Yeah, with setTimeout loop... but seriously?)
Another point is... if you work with APIs or just you own list's files or whatever you always use different functions for each request...
Only if you have a page where you load always the same XML/JSON or whatever you need only one function. In that case, modify a little the Ajax function and replace b with your special function.
The functions above are for basic use.
If you want to EXTEND the function...
Yes, you can.
I'm using a lot of APIs and one of the first functions I integrate into every HTML page is the first Ajax function in this answer, with GET only...
But you can do a lot of stuff with XMLHttpRequest 2:
I made a download manager (using ranges on both sides with resume, filereader, filesystem), various image resizers converters using canvas, populate websql databases with base64images and much more... But in these cases you should create a function only for that purpose... sometimes you need a blob, array buffers, you can set headers, override mimetype and there is a lot more...
But the question here is how to return an Ajax response... (I added an easy way.)
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/33814.html下一篇: 如何返回来自异步调用的响应？