Proper way to declare custom exceptions in modern Python?
What's the proper way to declare custom exception classes in modern Python? My primary goal is to follow whatever standard other exception classes have, so that (for instance) any extra string I include in the exception is printed out by whatever tool caught the exception.
By "modern Python" I mean something that will run in Python 2.5 but be 'correct' for the Python 2.6 and Python 3.* way of doing things. And by "custom" I mean an Exception object that can include extra data about the cause of the error: a string, maybe also some other arbitrary object relevant to the exception.
I was tripped up by the following deprecation warning in Python 2.6.2:
>>> class MyError(Exception):
... def __init__(self, message):
... self.message = message
...
>>> MyError("foo")
_sandbox.py:3: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6
It seems crazy that BaseException has a special meaning for attributes named message . I gather from PEP-352 that attribute did have a special meaning in 2.5 they're trying to deprecate away, so I guess that name (and that one alone) is now forbidden? Ugh.
I'm also fuzzily aware that Exception has some magic parameter args , but I've never known how to use it. Nor am I sure it's the right way to do things going forward; a lot of the discussion I found online suggested they were trying to do away with args in Python 3.
Update: two answers have suggested overriding __init__ , and __str__ / __unicode__ / __repr__ . That seems like a lot of typing, is it necessary?
Maybe I missed the question, but why not:
class MyException(Exception):
pass
Edit: to override something (or pass extra args), do this:
class ValidationError(Exception):
def __init__(self, message, errors):
# Call the base class constructor with the parameters it needs
super(ValidationError, self).__init__(message)
# Now for your custom code...
self.errors = errors
That way you could pass dict of error messages to the second param, and get to it later with e.errors
Python 3 Update: In Python 3+, you can use this slightly more compact use of super() :
class ValidationError(Exception):
def __init__(self, message, errors):
# Call the base class constructor with the parameters it needs
super().__init__(message)
# Now for your custom code...
self.errors = errors
With modern Python Exceptions, you don't need to abuse .message , or override .__str__() or .__repr__() or any of it. If all you want is an informative message when your exception is raised, do this:
class MyException(Exception):
pass
raise MyException("My hovercraft is full of eels")
That will give a traceback ending with MyException: My hovercraft is full of eels .
If you want more flexibility from the exception, you could pass a dictionary as the argument:
raise MyException({"message":"My hovercraft is full of animals", "animal":"eels"})
However, to get at those details in an except block is a bit more complicated. The details are stored in the args attribute, which is a list. You would need to do something like this:
try:
raise MyException({"message":"My hovercraft is full of animals", "animal":"eels"})
except MyException as e:
details = e.args[0]
print(details["animal"])
It is still possible to pass in multiple items to the exception, but this is highly discouraged (and was even intended for deprecation a while back). If you do need more than a single piece of information and the above method is not sufficient for you, then you should subclass Exception as described in the tutorial.
class MyError(Exception):
def __init__(self, message, animal):
self.message = message
self.animal = animal
def __str__(self):
return self.message
"Proper way to declare custom exceptions in modern Python?"
This is fine, unless your exception is really a type of a more specific exception:
class MyException(Exception):
pass
Or better (maybe perfect), instead of pass give a docstring:
class MyException(Exception):
"""Raise for my specific kind of exception"""
Subclassing Exception Subclasses
From the docs
Exception
All built-in, non-system-exiting exceptions are derived from this class. All user-defined exceptions should also be derived from this class.
That means that if your exception is a type of a more specific exception, subclass that exception instead of the generic Exception (and the result will be that you still derive from Exception as the docs recommend). Also, you can at least provide a docstring (and not be forced to use the pass keyword):
class MyAppValueError(ValueError):
'''Raise when my specific value is wrong'''
Set attributes you create yourself with a custom __init__ . Avoid passing a dict as a positional argument, future users of your code will thank you. If you use the deprecated message attribute, assigning it yourself will avoid a DeprecationWarning :
class MyAppValueError(ValueError):
'''Raise when a specific subset of values in context of app is wrong'''
def __init__(self, message, foo, *args):
self.message = message # without this you may get DeprecationWarning
# Special attribute you desire with your Error,
# perhaps the value that caused the error?:
self.foo = foo
# allow users initialize misc. arguments as any other builtin Error
super(MyAppValueError, self).__init__(message, foo, *args)
There's really no need to write your own __str__ or __repr__ . The builtin ones are very nice, and your cooperative inheritance ensures that you use it.
Critique of the top answer
Maybe I missed the question, but why not:
class MyException(Exception):
pass
Again, the problem with the above is that in order to catch it, you'll either have to name it specifically (importing it if created elsewhere) or catch Exception, (but you're probably not prepared to handle all types of Exceptions, and you should only catch exceptions you are prepared to handle). Similar criticism to the below, but additionally that's not the way to initialize via super , and you'll get a DeprecationWarning if you access the message attribute:
Edit: to override something (or pass extra args), do this:
class ValidationError(Exception):
def __init__(self, message, errors):
# Call the base class constructor with the parameters it needs
super(ValidationError, self).__init__(message)
# Now for your custom code...
self.errors = errors
That way you could pass dict of error messages to the second param, and get to it later with e.errors
It also requires exactly two arguments to be passed in (aside from the self .) No more, no less. That's an interesting constraint that future users may not appreciate.
To be direct - it violates Liskov substitutability.
I'll demonstrate both errors:
>>> ValidationError('foo', 'bar', 'baz').message
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<pyshell#10>", line 1, in <module>
ValidationError('foo', 'bar', 'baz').message
TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (4 given)
>>> ValidationError('foo', 'bar').message
__main__:1: DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of Python 2.6
'foo'
Compared to:
>>> MyAppValueError('foo', 'FOO', 'bar').message
'foo'
上一篇: 用Java中的许多参数管理构造函数