Bitwise operators and "endianness"

Does endianness matter at all with the bitwise operations? Either logical or shifting?

I'm working on homework with regard to bitwise operators, and I can not make heads or tails on it, and I think I'm getting quite hung up on the endianess. That is, I'm using a little endian machine (like most are), but does this need to be considered or is it a wasted fact?

In case it matters, I'm using C.

---

Endianness only matters for layout of data in memory. As soon as data is loaded by the processor to be operated on, endianness is completely irrelevent. Shifts, bitwise operations, and so on perform as you would expect (data logically laid out as low-order bit to high) regardless of endianness.

---

The bitwise operators abstract away the endianness. For example, the >> operator always shifts the bits towards the least significant digit. However, this doesn't mean you are safe to completely ignore endianness when using them, for example when dealing with individual bytes in a larger structure you cannot always assume that they will fall in the same place.

short temp = 0x1234;
temp = temp >> 8;

// on little endian, c will be 0x12, on big endian, it will be 0x0
char c=((char*)&temp)[0];

To clarify, I am not in basic disagreement with the other answers here. The point I am trying to make is to emphasise that although the bitwise operators are essentially endian neutral, you cannot ignore the effect of endianess in your code, especially when combined with other operators.

---

正如其他人所提到的，移位是由C语言规范定义的，并且独立于字节序，但是实现右移可能会根据体系结构使用补码还是二进制补码算法而有所不同。

链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/36388.html

上一篇: 如何在整个数组中移位

下一篇: 按位运算符和“字节顺序”