Enum and static variable in constructor
Access to static fields in enum constructor is forbidden by the compiler. The source code below works, it uses a static field:
public enum TrickyEnum
{
TrickyEnum1, TrickyEnum2;
static int count;
TrickyEnum()
{
incrementCount();
}
private static void incrementCount()
{
count++;
}
public static void main(String... args)
{
System.out.println("Count: " + count);
}
}
Output:
Count: 2.
But the code below does not work despite there being very little difference:
public enum TrickyEnum
{
TrickyEnum1, TrickyEnum2;
static int count;
TrickyEnum()
{
count++; //compiler error
}
public static void main(String... args)
{
System.out.println("Count: " + count);
}
}
From my search, people usually claim that the problem is due to the order in which static fields are initialized. But first example works, so why do Java developers forbid the second example? It should also work.
The compiler allows a call to a static function, because it is not smart enough to prohibit it: the legitimacy of the call cannot be deduced without looking into the body of the incrementCount
method.
The reason this is prohibited becomes clear when you run the following code:
enum TrickyEnum
{
TrickyEnum1, TrickyEnum2;
static int count = 123; // Added an initial value
TrickyEnum()
{
incrementCount();
}
private static void incrementCount()
{
count++;
System.out.println("Count: " + count);
}
public static void showCount()
{
System.out.println("Count: " + count);
}
}
public static void main (String[] args) throws java.lang.Exception
{
TrickyEnum te = TrickyEnum.TrickyEnum1;
TrickyEnum.showCount();
}
This prints
1
2
123
which is extremely confusing to a programmer reading your code: essentially, incrementCount
does its modifications to the static field before it has been initialized.
Here is a demo of this code on ideone.
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/38068.html上一篇: 一个枚举可以为每个常量有一个构造函数
下一篇: 枚举和静态变量在构造函数中