Using module 'subprocess' with timeout
Here's the Python code to run an arbitrary command returning its stdout data, or raise an exception on non-zero exit codes:
proc = subprocess.Popen(
cmd,
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, # Merge stdout and stderr
stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
shell=True)
communicate is used to wait for the process to exit:
stdoutdata, stderrdata = proc.communicate()
The subprocess module does not support timeout--ability to kill a process running for more than X number of seconds--therefore, communicate may take forever to run.
What is the simplest way to implement timeouts in a Python program meant to run on Windows and Linux?
In Python 3.3+:
from subprocess import STDOUT, check_output
output = check_output(cmd, stderr=STDOUT, timeout=seconds)
output is a byte string that contains command's merged stdout, stderr data.
This code raises CalledProcessError on non-zero exit status as specified in the question's text unlike proc.communicate() method.
I've removed shell=True because it is often used unnecessarily. You can always add it back if cmd indeed requires it. If you add shell=True ie, if the child process spawns its own descendants; check_output() can return much later than the timeout indicates, see Subprocess timeout failure.
The timeout feature is available on Python 2.x via the subprocess32 backport of the 3.2+ subprocess module.
I don't know much about the low level details; but, given that in python 2.6 the API offers the ability to wait for threads and terminate processes, what about running the process in a separate thread?
import subprocess, threading
class Command(object):
def __init__(self, cmd):
self.cmd = cmd
self.process = None
def run(self, timeout):
def target():
print 'Thread started'
self.process = subprocess.Popen(self.cmd, shell=True)
self.process.communicate()
print 'Thread finished'
thread = threading.Thread(target=target)
thread.start()
thread.join(timeout)
if thread.is_alive():
print 'Terminating process'
self.process.terminate()
thread.join()
print self.process.returncode
command = Command("echo 'Process started'; sleep 2; echo 'Process finished'")
command.run(timeout=3)
command.run(timeout=1)
The output of this snippet in my machine is:
Thread started
Process started
Process finished
Thread finished
0
Thread started
Process started
Terminating process
Thread finished
-15
where it can be seen that, in the first execution, the process finished correctly (return code 0), while the in the second one the process was terminated (return code -15).
I haven't tested in windows; but, aside from updating the example command, I think it should work since I haven't found in the documentation anything that says that thread.join or process.terminate is not supported.
使用threading.Timer类可以简化jcollado的答案：
import shlex
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
from threading import Timer
def run(cmd, timeout_sec):
proc = Popen(shlex.split(cmd), stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
timer = Timer(timeout_sec, proc.kill)
try:
timer.start()
stdout, stderr = proc.communicate()
finally:
timer.cancel()
# Examples: both take 1 second
run("sleep 1", 5) # process ends normally at 1 second
run("sleep 5", 1) # timeout happens at 1 second
下一篇: 超时使用模块“subprocess”