Promise vs Observable
Can someone please explain the difference between Promise and Observable in Angular?
An example on each would be helpful in understanding both the cases. In what scenario can we use each case?
Promise
A Promise handles a single event when an async operation completes or fails.
Note: There are Promise libraries out there that support cancellation, but ES6 Promise doesn't so far.
Observable
An Observable is like a Stream (in many languages) and allows to pass zero or more events where the callback is called for each event.
Often Observable is preferred over Promise because it provides the features of Promise and more. With Observable it doesn't matter if you want to handle 0, 1, or multiple events. You can utilize the same API in each case.
Observable also has the advantage over Promise to be cancelable . If the result of an HTTP request to a server or some other expensive async operation isn't needed anymore, the Subscription of an Observable allows to cancel the subscription, while a Promise will eventually call the success or failed callback even when you don't need the notification or the result it provides anymore.
Observable provides operators like map , forEach , reduce , ... similar to an array
There are also powerful operators like retry() , or replay() , ... that are often quite handy.
Promises:
Observables:
Both Promises and Observables provide us with abstractions that help us deal with the asynchronous nature of our applications. The difference between them was pointed out clearly by @Günter and @Relu.
Since a code snippet is worth a thousand words, let go through the below example to understand them easier.
Thanks @Christoph Burgdorf for the awesome article
Angular uses Rx.js Observables instead of promises for dealing with HTTP.
Suppose that you are building a search function that should instantly show you results as you type. Sound familiar but there are a lot of challenges that come with that task.
HTTP requests. Basically, we only want to hit it once the user has stopped typing instead of with every keystroke. The demo will simply consist of two files: app.ts and wikipedia-service.ts . In a real world scenario, we would most likely split things further up, though.
Below is Promise-based implementation that doesn't handle any of the described edge cases.
wikipedia-service.ts
import { Injectable } from '@angular/core';
import { URLSearchParams, Jsonp } from '@angular/http';
@Injectable()
export class WikipediaService {
constructor(private jsonp: Jsonp) {}
search (term: string) {
var search = new URLSearchParams()
search.set('action', 'opensearch');
search.set('search', term);
search.set('format', 'json');
return this.jsonp
.get('http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?callback=JSONP_CALLBACK', { search })
.toPromise()
.then((response) => response.json()[1]);
}
}
We are injecting the Jsonp service to make a GET request against the Wikipedia API with a given search term. Notice that we call toPromise in order to get from an Observable<Response> to a Promise<Response> . Eventually end up with a Promise<Array<string>> as the return type of our search method.
app.ts
// check the plnkr for the full list of imports
import {...} from '...';
@Component({
selector: 'my-app',
template: `
<div>
<h2>Wikipedia Search</h2>
<input #term type="text" (keyup)="search(term.value)">
<ul>
<li *ngFor="let item of items">{{item}}</li>
</ul>
</div>
`
})
export class AppComponent {
items: Array<string>;
constructor(private wikipediaService: WikipediaService) {}
search(term) {
this.wikipediaService.search(term)
.then(items => this.items = items);
}
}
Not much of a surprise here either. We inject our WikipediaService and expose it's functionality via a search method to the template. The template simply binds to keyup and calls search(term.value) .
We unwrap the result of the Promise that the search method of the WikipediaService returns and expose it as a simple Array of strings to the template so that we can have *ngFor loop through it and build up a list for us.
See the example of Promise-based implementation on Plunker
Where Observables really shine
Let's change our code to not hammer the endpoint with every keystroke but instead only send a request when the user stopped typing for 400 ms
To unveil such super powers we first need to get an Observable<string> that carries the search term that the user types in. Instead of manually binding to the keyup event, we can take advantage of Angular's formControl directive. To use this directive, we first need to import the ReactiveFormsModule into our application module.
app.ts
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser';
import { JsonpModule } from '@angular/http';
import { ReactiveFormsModule } from '@angular/forms';
@NgModule({
imports: [BrowserModule, JsonpModule, ReactiveFormsModule]
declarations: [AppComponent],
bootstrap: [AppComponent]
})
export class AppModule {}
Once imported, we can use formControl from within our template and set it to the name "term".
<input type="text" [formControl]="term"/>
In our component, we create an instance of FormControl from @angular/form and expose it as a field under the name term on our component.
Behind the scenes, term automatically exposes an Observable<string> as property valueChanges that we can subscribe to. Now that we have an Observable<string> , overcoming the user input is as easy as calling debounceTime(400) on our Observable . This will return a new Observable<string> that will only emit a new value when there haven't been coming new values for 400ms.
export class App {
items: Array<string>;
term = new FormControl();
constructor(private wikipediaService: WikipediaService) {
this.term.valueChanges
.debounceTime(400) // wait for 400ms pause in events
.distinctUntilChanged() // ignore if next search term is same as previous
.subscribe(term => this.wikipediaService.search(term).then(items => this.items = items));
}
}
It would be a waste of resources to send out another request for a search term that our app already shows the results for. All we have to do to achieve the desired behavior is to call the distinctUntilChanged operator right after we called debounceTime(400)
See the example of Observable implementation on Plunker
For dealing with out-of-order responses, please check the full article http://blog.thoughtram.io/angular/2016/01/06/taking-advantage-of-observables-in-angular2.html
As far as I am using Http in Angular, I agree that in the normal use cases there is not much difference when using Observable over Promise. None of the advantages are really relevant here in practice. Hope I can see some advanced use case in the future :)
Learn more
上一篇: 如何构建嵌套的Promise