Azure CDN vs Azure Blob storage origin pull takes way too long
I am using azure blob storage to store images in a public container and embedding them in a public website. Everything works fine, blobs are publicly available on xxxxx.blob.core.windows.net the instant i upload them. I wanted to use Azure CDN for their edge caching infrastructure and set up one at xxxxx.vo.msecnd.net .
But now, when i point my images to the CDN, it returns 404 for a good 15 mins or so, then it starts serving. It's mentioned on their documentation that we should not use CDN for high violatile or frequently changing blobs, but a simple CMS with image upload feature for a public site warrants a CDN isn't it?
I am in exactly the same situation at the moment for product images that are uploaded to my e-commerce site. I prefer to use Azure CDN on top of Azure blob storage for all of the obvious reasons but cannot wait 15 minutes for the image to be available.
For now I have resolved to store the blob storage URL initially but then later rewrite it to use the CDN domain via an Azure WebJob running once daily. It seems like an unnecessary amount of extra work but I haven't yet found a better option and really want to use the Azure CDN.
我现在正在做什么...用于部署前手动上传的网站相关图像和文件（https://abc.blob.core.windows.net/cdn）以及如果网站用户使用我的网站上传图像或文件在内部，我使用CloudBlobClient将该文件上传到blob存储（单独的容器不是CDN）
CDN enables a user to fetch content from a CDN-POP that is geographically closest to the user thus allowing lower read latencies. Without a CDN, every request would reach the origin server (in your case Azure Storage). The low latency offered by CDN is achieved when there are cache hits. On a cache miss, a CDN-POP will fetch the content from the origin server reducing the latency benefit offered by CDN. Cache hits are usually dependent on whether the content is static (results in cache hits) or dynamic (results in cache miss) and its popularity (hot objects result in cache hit).
Your choice of using a CDN or not depends on a) whether your files are static or dynamic, if dynamic then the benefit of using a CDN is lower b) whether low latency is important to your application and c) Request rate : With low number of requests your files are likely to be cached-out so a CDN may not be that useful and d) Whether you have high scalability requirements. Note, Azure storage has the following scalability limits. If your application exceeds the scalability limits of azure storage then it is recommended to use a CDN
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/65552.html上一篇: Azure存储和CDN和blob