Marionette.js compared to Chaplin.js
I currently in the process of concepting a large single page web application. There will be a lot of components, so a separation of concerns is important to me. The Server is basically a REST-Server with some sugar, like sending Template Code to the client.
So I need to decide which MVC Framework I want to use client side.
I really like backbone.js so I want to have a big Framework relying on it.
What I came over is Marionette.js and Chaplin.js.
Has anybody used one or both frameworks and can say a little bit about them? Strengths, weaknesses, community behind it or are they basically the same?
This should not be a discussion about which is better, just a short feature list, so I can decide better which one to use, because I don't have the time to really get started with both.
Haven't worked with Marionette but basically Chaplin is a wise decision when:
Also, if you are building a big application, in Chaplin get prepared to figure a LOT of things yourself. The documentation is there, but often you will find yourself 'alone in the dark'. Source is well commented though, which is appreciated.
I have experience with Marionette.js about 1 year. Marionette.js is the best option when you have your own architecture, but you haven't ideas how working with views layer. I like the next scheme:
I've recommended to you brunch tool - is rich tool to compile, prepare and build your own SPA. Of course you must see Grunt + Yo + Bower its another rich tool.
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/71012.html