Understanding PrimeFaces process/update and JSF f:ajax execute/render attributes
What exactly are process and update in PrimeFaces p:commandXxx components and execute and render in f:ajax tag?
Which works at the time of validation? What does update attribute do rather than updating value to component from back end? Do process attribute bind value to model? What exactly do @this , @parent , @all and @form in both attributes?
The example below is working fine, but I am a little confused in basic concepts.
<p:commandButton process="@parent"
update="@form"
action="#{bean.submit}"
value="Submit" />
<p:commandXxx process> <p:ajax process> <f:ajax execute>
The process attribute is server side and can only affect UIComponent s implementing EditableValueHolder (input fields) or ActionSource (command fields). The process attribute tells JSF, using a space-separated list of client IDs, which components exactly must be processed through the entire JSF lifecycle upon (partial) form submit.
JSF will then apply the request values (finding HTTP request parameter based on component's own client ID and then either setting it as submitted value in case of EditableValueHolder components or queueing a new ActionEvent in case of ActionSource components), perform conversion, validation and updating the model values ( EditableValueHolder components only) and finally invoke the queued ActionEvent ( ActionSource components only). JSF will skip processing of all other components which are not covered by process attribute. Also, components whose rendered attribute evaluates to false during apply request values phase will also be skipped as part of safeguard against tampered requests.
Note that it's in case of ActionSource components (such as <p:commandButton> ) very important that you also include the component itself in the process attribute, particularly if you intend to invoke the action associated with the component. So the below example which intends to process only certain input component(s) when a certain command component is invoked ain't gonna work:
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
<p:commandButton process="foo" action="#{bean.action}" />
It would only process the #{bean.foo} and not the #{bean.action} . You'd need to include the command component itself as well:
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
<p:commandButton process="@this foo" action="#{bean.action}" />
Or, as you apparently found out, using @parent if they happen to be the only components having a common parent:
<p:panel><!-- Type doesn't matter, as long as it's a common parent. -->
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
<p:commandButton process="@parent" action="#{bean.action}" />
</p:panel>
Or, if they both happen to be the only components of the parent UIForm component, then you can also use @form :
<h:form>
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" />
<p:commandButton process="@form" action="#{bean.action}" />
</h:form>
This is sometimes undesirable if the form contains more input components which you'd like to skip in processing, more than often in cases when you'd like to update another input component(s) or some UI section based on the current input component in an ajax listener method. You namely don't want that validation errors on other input components are preventing the ajax listener method from being executed.
Then there's the @all . This has no special effect in process attribute, but only in update attribute. A process="@all" behaves exactly the same as process="@form" . HTML doesn't support submitting multiple forms at once anyway.
There's by the way also a @none which may be useful in case you absolutely don't need to process anything, but only want to update some specific parts via update , particularly those sections whose content doesn't depend on submitted values or action listeners.
The standard JSF equivalent to the PrimeFaces specific process is execute from <f:ajax execute> . It behaves exactly the same except that it doesn't support a comma-separated string while the PrimeFaces one does (although I personally recommend to just stick to space-separated convention), nor the @parent keyword. Also, it may be useful to know that <p:commandXxx process> defaults to @form while <p:ajax process> and <f:ajax execute> defaults to @this . Finally, it's also useful to know that process supports the so-called "PrimeFaces Selectors", see also How do PrimeFaces Selectors as in update="@(.myClass)" work?
<p:commandXxx update> <p:ajax update> <f:ajax render>
The update attribute is client side and can affect the HTML representation of all UIComponent s. The update attribute tells JavaScript (the one responsible for handling the ajax request/response), using a space-separated list of client IDs, which parts in the HTML DOM tree need to be updated as response to the form submit.
JSF will then prepare the right ajax response for that, containing only the requested parts to update. JSF will skip all other components which are not covered by update attribute in the ajax response, hereby keeping the response payload small. Also, components whose rendered attribute evaluates to false during render response phase will be skipped. Note that even though it would return true , JavaScript cannot update it in the HTML DOM tree if it was initially false . You'd need to wrap it or update its parent instead. See also Ajax update/render does not work on a component which has rendered attribute.
Usually, you'd like to update only the components which really need to be "refreshed" in the client side upon (partial) form submit. The example below updates the entire parent form via @form :
<h:form>
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" required="true" />
<p:message id="foo_m" for="foo" />
<p:inputText id="bar" value="#{bean.bar}" required="true" />
<p:message id="bar_m" for="bar" />
<p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="@form" />
</h:form>
(note that process attribute is omitted as that defaults to @form already)
Whilst that may work fine, the update of input and command components is in this particular example unnecessary. Unless you change the model values foo and bar inside action method (which would in turn be unintuitive in UX perspective), there's no point of updating them. The message components are the only which really need to be updated:
<h:form>
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" required="true" />
<p:message id="foo_m" for="foo" />
<p:inputText id="bar" value="#{bean.bar}" required="true" />
<p:message id="bar_m" for="bar" />
<p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="foo_m bar_m" />
</h:form>
However, that gets tedious when you have many of them. That's one of the reasons why PrimeFaces Selectors exist. Those message components have in the generated HTML output a common style class of ui-message , so the following should also do:
<h:form>
<p:inputText id="foo" value="#{bean.foo}" required="true" />
<p:message id="foo_m" for="foo" />
<p:inputText id="bar" value="#{bean.bar}" required="true" />
<p:message id="bar_m" for="bar" />
<p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="@(.ui-message)" />
</h:form>
(note that you should keep the IDs on message components, otherwise @(...) won't work! Again, see How do PrimeFaces Selectors as in update="@(.myClass)" work? for detail)
The @parent updates only the parent component, which thus covers the current component and all siblings and their children. This is more useful if you have separated the form in sane groups with each its own responsibility. The @this updates, obviously, only the current component. Normally, this is only necessary when you need to change one of the component's own HTML attributes in the action method. Eg
<p:commandButton action="#{bean.action}" update="@this"
oncomplete="doSomething('#{bean.value}')" />
Imagine that the oncomplete needs to work with the value which is changed in action , then this construct wouldn't have worked if the component isn't updated, for the simple reason that oncomplete is part of generated HTML output (and thus all EL expressions in there are evaluated during render response).
The @all updates the entire document, which should be used with care. Normally, you'd like to use a true GET request for this instead by either a plain link ( <a> or <h:link> ) or a redirect-after-POST by ?faces-redirect=true or ExternalContext#redirect() . In effects, process="@form" update="@all" has exactly the same effect as a non-ajax (non-partial) submit. In my entire JSF career, the only sensible use case I encountered for @all is to display an error page in its entirety in case an exception occurs during an ajax request. See also What is the correct way to deal with JSF 2.0 exceptions for AJAXified components?
The standard JSF equivalent to the PrimeFaces specific update is render from <f:ajax render> . It behaves exactly the same except that it doesn't support a comma-separated string while the PrimeFaces one does (although I personally recommend to just stick to space-separated convention), nor the @parent keyword. Both update and render defaults to @none (which is, "nothing").
See also:
如果你很难记住默认值（我知道我有......），这里有一个来自BalusC的答案的简短摘录：
Component | Submit | Refresh ------------ | --------------- | -------------- f:ajax | execute="@this" | render="@none" p:ajax | process="@this" | update="@none" p:commandXXX | process="@form" | update="@none"
By process (in the JSF specification it's called execute) you tell JSF to limit the processing to component that are specified every thing else is just ignored.
update indicates which element will be updated when the server respond back to you request.
@all : Every component is processed/rendered.
@this : The requesting component with the execute attribute is processed/rendered.
@form : The form that contains the requesting component is processed/rendered.
@parent : The parent that contains the requesting component is processed/rendered.
With Primefaces you can even use JQuery selectors, check out this blog: http://blog.primefaces.org/?p=1867
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/71662.html上一篇: 操作系统开发入门有哪些资源？