What types are special to the Scala compiler?
Scala makes a big deal about how what seem to be language features are implemented as library features.
Is there a list of types that are treated specially by the language?
Either in the specification or as an implementation detail?
That would include, for example, optimizing away matches on tuples.
What about special conventions related to pattern matching, for comprehensions, try-catch blocks and other language constructs?
Is String somehow special to the compiler? I see that String enhancement is just a library implicit conversion, and that String concatenation is supported by Predef
, but is that somehow special-cased by the language?
Similarly, I see questions about <:<
and classOf
and asInstanceOf
, and it's not clear what is a magical intrinsic. Is there a way to tell the difference, either with a compiler option or by looking at byte code?
I would like to understand if a feature is supported uniformly by implementations such as Scala.JS and Scala-native, or if a feature might actually prove to be implementation-dependent, depending on the library implementation.
There is an incredible amount of types that are "known" of the compiler, and are special to varying degrees. You can find a complete list in scalac's Definitions.scala.
We can probably classify them according to the degree of specialness they bear.
Disclaimer: I have probably forgotten a few more.
Special for the type system
The following types are crucial to Scala's type system. They have an influence on how type checking itself is performed. All these types are mentioned in the specification (or at least, they definitely should be).
Any
, AnyRef
, AnyVal
, Null
, Nothing
: the five types that sit at the top and bottom of Scala's type system. scala.FunctionN
, the (canonical) type given of anonymous functions (including eta-expansion). Even in 2.12, which has the SAM treatment of anonymous functions, FunctionN
remains special in some cases (notably in overloading resolution). scala.PartialFunction
(has an impact on how type inference works) Unit
Int
, Long
, Float
, Double
, Char
, Boolean
, String
, Symbol
, java.lang.Class
Char
s, for weak conformance (together, these two bullets cover all primitive types) Option
and tuples (for pattern matching and auto-tupling) java.lang.Throwable
scala.Dynamic
scala.Singleton
scala.reflect.*
, in particular ClassTag
, TypeTag
, etc. scala.annotation.{,ClassFile,Static}Annotation
scala.annotation.*
(eg, unchecked
) scala.language.*
scala.math.ScalaNumber
(for obscure reasons) Known to the compiler as the desugaring of some language features
The following types are not crucial to the type system. They do not have an influence on type checking. However, the Scala language does feature a number of constructs which desugar into expressions of those types.
These types would also be mentioned in the specification.
scala.collection.Seq
, Nil
and WrappedArray
, which are used for varargs parameters. TupleN
types Product
and Serializable
(for case classes) MatchError
, generated by pattern matching constructs scala.xml.*
scala.DelayedInit
List
(the compiler performs some trivial optimizations on those, such as rewriting List()
as Nil
) Known to the implementation of the language
This is probably the list that you care most about, given that you said you were interested in knowing what could go differently on different back-ends. The previous categories are handled by early (front-end) phases of the compiler, and are therefore shared by Scala/JVM, Scala.js and Scala Native. This category is typically known of the compiler back-end, and so potentially have different treatments. Note that both Scala.js and Scala Native do try to mimic the semantics of Scala/JVM to a reasonable degree.
Those types might not be mentioned in the language specification per se, at least not all of them.
Here are those where the back-ends agree (re Scala Native, to the best of my knowledge):
Boolean
, Char
, Byte
, Short
, Int
, Long
, Float
, Double
, Unit
. scala.Array
. Cloneable
(currently not supported in Scala Native, see #334) String
and StringBuilder
(mostly for string concatenation) Object
, for virtually all its methods And here are those where they disagree:
java.lang.Integer
) Serializable
java.rmi.Remote
and java.rmi.RemoteException
scala.annotation.*
(eg, strictfp
) java.lang.reflect.*
, used by Scala/JVM to implement structural types Also, although not types per se, but a long list of primitive methods are also handled specifically by the back-ends.
Platform-specific types
In addition to the types mentioned above, which are available on all platforms, non-JVM platforms add their own special types for interoperability purposes.
Scala.js-specific types
See JSDefinitions.scala
js.Any
: conceptually a third subtype of Any
, besides AnyVal
and AnyRef
. They have JavaScript semantics instead of Scala semantics. String
and the boxed versions of all primitive types (heavily rewritten--so-called "hijacked"--by the compiler) js.ThisFunctionN
: their apply
methods behave differently than that of other JavaScript types (the first actual argument becomes the thisArgument
of the called function) js.UndefOr
and js.|
(they behave as JS types even though they do not extend js.Any
) js.Object
( new js.Object()
is special-cased as an empty JS object literal {}
) js.JavaScriptException
(behaves very specially in throw
and catch
) js.WrappedArray
(used by the desugaring of varargs) js.ConstructorTag
(similar to ClassTag
) js.native
, and all annotations in js.annotation.*
Plus, a dozen more primitive methods.
Scala Native-specific types
See NirDefinitions.scala
UByte
, UShort
, UInt
and ULong
Ptr
, the pointer type FunctionPtrN
, the function pointer types native.*
scala.scalanative.runtime
上一篇: foreach循环在scala中
下一篇: 什么类型是特殊的Scala编译器?