About C/C++ stack allocation
While studying C++ (and C) I had some particular doubts regarding the working of stack allocation, that I can't find a solution to:
Does stack allocation call malloc/free functions implicitly? If not; how does it assure there is no conflict between stack allocation and heap allocation?
If yes; does stack allocation in C++ implicitly call new/delete too? If yes; does overloading the new operator for a class affect its stack allocation?
It yielded confusing results in VC++; but as VC++ isn't entirely standard-compliant (or so I heard) I decided I better ask here...
Stack allocation doesn't use anything like malloc/free. It uses a piece of memory called program stack which is just a contiguous segment of memory.
There's a special register that stores the top of the stack. When a new object is created on stack the top is raised thus increasing the stack, when an object is deallocated (goes out of scope) the top is lowered thus decreasing the stack.
If you try to allocate a too large object on stack or go too deep into recursion the top will outgrow the maximum allowed size of the stack and this is called stack overflow.
Note: actual direction of stack growth (increasing or decreasing addresses) will vary by system, but general idea is the same regardless of actual direction.
The answer to your first question is No. Stack is not allocated from the heap at all.
You should read What and where are the stack and heap first to understand the basic concepts.
Stack allocation is typically done in terms of alloca() or implicitly by the compiler. A well-done alloca() will only require a scant few instructions, and there is no cost (or even a need) to free it when you're done.
You can pass a pointer to memory allocated by alloca() to any other function/method that expects a pointer. You MUST NEVER return a pointer allocated by alloca().
Here are some advantages and disadvantages to using stack allocation.
链接地址: http://www.djcxy.com/p/82798.html上一篇: 在堆栈或堆上
下一篇: 关于C / C ++堆栈分配