I have one MSMQ-WCF service that is creating a queue and maintains the MSMQ queue service. Also, I have another WCF Services hosted in WAS, working like a Listener. As soon as a message arrives in the MSMQ Queue, it should be automatically picked from the queue and the message should be read. I just wanted to use it MSMQ Listener adapter. Is there any other way to do this? Please let me k
我有一个MSMQ-WCF服务正在创建队列并维护MSMQ队列服务。 另外，我还有另一个WAS服务托管在WAS中，像一个Listener一样工作。 只要消息到达MSMQ队列中，就应该自动从队列中选取消息并读取消息。 我只是想用它MSMQ Listener适配器。 有没有其他方法可以做到这一点？ 请告诉我。 在Windows服务中托管队列侦听器要简单得多。 这样就不需要涉及WAS和所有可能涉及的复杂设置。
I like instantiating my WCF service clients within a using block as it's pretty much the standard way to use resources that implement IDisposable : using (var client = new SomeWCFServiceClient()) { //Do something with the client } But, as noted in this MSDN article, wrapping a WCF client in a using block could mask any errors that result in the client being left in a faulted state (li
我喜欢在using块中实例化我的WCF服务客户端，因为它几乎是使用实现IDisposable资源的标准方式： using (var client = new SomeWCFServiceClient()) { //Do something with the client } 但是，如本MSDN文章中所述，将WCF客户端封装在using块中可能会掩盖导致客户端处于故障状态（如超时或通信问题）的任何错误。 长话短说，在调用Dispose（）时，客户端的Close（）方法会触发，但会因为处于故障状态而引发错误。 原来
I have a sample program with a base Fruit class and a derived Apple class. class Testy { public delegate void FruitDelegate<T>(T o) where T : Fruit; private List<FruitDelegate<Fruit>> fruits = new List<FruitDelegate<Fruit>>(); public void Test() { FruitDelegate<Apple> f = new FruitDelegate<Apple>(EatFruit); fruits.Add(f
我有一个基础Fruit类和衍生Apple类的示例程序。 class Testy { public delegate void FruitDelegate<T>(T o) where T : Fruit; private List<FruitDelegate<Fruit>> fruits = new List<FruitDelegate<Fruit>>(); public void Test() { FruitDelegate<Apple> f = new FruitDelegate<Apple>(EatFruit); fruits.Add(f); // Error on this line }
I am trying to implement C#'s ExpandoObject -like class in Scala. This is how it is supposed to work: val e = new ExpandoObject e.name := "Rahul" // This inserts a new field `name` in the object. println(e.name) // Accessing its value. Here is what I have tried so far: implicit def enrichAny[A](underlying: A) = new EnrichedAny(underlying) class EnrichedAny[A](underlying: A) { // ... d
我正在尝试在Scala中实现C＃的类ExpandoObject类。 这是它应该如何工作的： val e = new ExpandoObject e.name := "Rahul" // This inserts a new field `name` in the object. println(e.name) // Accessing its value. 这是我迄今为止所尝试的： implicit def enrichAny[A](underlying: A) = new EnrichedAny(underlying) class EnrichedAny[A](underlying: A) { // ... def dyn = new Dyn(underlying.asInstanceOf[Any
Is there a nuget package, or other "standard" that wraps the hard dependency created when your code is coupled to DateTime.Now ? I'm seeking guidance on this before writing my own. Albeit that it's trivial to do so, I'd rather use something that exists if it already does as somewhat of a standard. I very much doubt that there's any nuget package for anything quite s
是否有Nuget软件包或其他“标准”包装了当您的代码与DateTime.Now耦合时创建的硬性依赖关系？ 在写我自己的作品之前，我正在寻求指导。 尽管这样做很微不足道，但我宁愿使用一些存在的东西，如果它已经成为一种标准。 我非常怀疑有任何nuget包对于任何非常微不足道的东西 - 一个接口和两个实现（“系统”时钟和一个假的测试）。 如果你自己做这些，我会强烈考虑让时钟返回一个DateTimeOffset而不是DateTime ，或者至少让它换
I am trying to make sure that a certain page is never cached, and never shown when the user clicks the back button. This very highly rated answer (currently 1068 upvotes) says to use: Response.AppendHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate"); Response.AppendHeader("Pragma", "no-cache"); Response.AppendHeader("Expires", "0"); However in IIS7 / ASP.NET MVC, when I send those
我试图确保某个页面不会被缓存，并且在用户单击后退按钮时从不显示。 这非常高评价的答案（目前1068 upvotes）说使用： Response.AppendHeader("Cache-Control", "no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate"); Response.AppendHeader("Pragma", "no-cache"); Response.AppendHeader("Expires", "0"); 但是在IIS7 / ASP.NET MVC中，当我发送这些头文件时，客户端会看到这些响应头文件： Cache-control: private, s-maxage=0 // tha
After this question, it makes me comfortable when using async operations in ASP.NET MVC. So, I wrote two blog posts on that: My Take on Task-based Asynchronous Programming in C# 5.0 and ASP.NET MVC Web Applications Asynchronous Database Calls With Task-based Asynchronous Programming Model (TAP) in ASP.NET MVC 4 I have too many misunderstandings in my mind about asynchronous operations on A
在这个问题之后，在ASP.NET MVC中使用异步操作时，它让我感觉很舒服。 所以，我写了两篇博文： 我在C＃5.0和ASP.NET MVC Web应用程序中采用基于任务的异步编程 使用ASP.NET MVC 4中的基于任务的异步编程模型（TAP）调用异步数据库 我对ASP.NET MVC上的异步操作有太多的误解。 我总是听到这句话： 如果操作异步运行，应用程序可以更好地扩展 而且我也听到过很多这样的句子： 如果流量很大，最好不要异步执行查询 - 消
This question already has an answer here: How do I find the absolute url of an action in ASP.NET MVC? 9 answers There is an overload of Url.Action that takes your desired protocol (eg http, https) as an argument - if you specify this, you get a fully qualified URL. Here's an example that uses the protocol of the current request in an action method: var fullUrl = this.Url.Action("Edit"
这个问题在这里已经有了答案： 如何在ASP.NET MVC中查找动作的绝对URL？ 9个答案 Url.Action有一个重载，它将所需的协议（例如http，https）作为参数 - 如果指定了此参数，则会获得完全限定的URL。 以下是一个在操作方法中使用当前请求协议的示例： var fullUrl = this.Url.Action("Edit", "Posts", new { id = 5 }, this.Request.Url.Scheme); HtmlHelper（@Html）也有一个ActionLink方法的重载，您可以在剃刀中使用该
I'm writing a plugin system to run client-provided untrusted code in my server application (C#, .NET 4.0). In order to do this, i'm running each plugin in a new sandboxed AppDomain. However, I'm stuck on a security exception that I don't really understand the reason for. I have made a streamlined console application sample to illustrate the problem: namespace SandboxTest {
我正在编写一个插件系统来在我的服务器应用程序（C＃，.NET 4.0）中运行客户端提供的不可信代码。 为了做到这一点，我在新的沙箱AppDomain中运行每个插件。 然而，我坚持一个安全例外，我不明白其中的原因。 我已经制作了简化的控制台应用程序示例来说明问题： namespace SandboxTest { class Program { static void Main( string[] args ) { Sandbox sandbox = new Sandbox();
Windows 7 uses an automatic mechanism to detect whether an application needs elevated administrator privileges. Or the application itself has a manifest. Is there a way to find out programmatically whether a specified application needs elevated administrator privileges or not? I don't want to start it to find it out. Thank you ;). There's really just one way to tell Windows that a
Windows 7使用自动机制来检测应用程序是否需要提升的管理员权限。 或者应用程序本身有一个清单。 有没有办法通过编程来找出指定应用程序是否需要提升管理员权限？ 我不想开始发现它。 谢谢 ;）。 实际上只有一种方法可以告诉Windows，程序需要升级，这是通过清单文件。 清单文件可以嵌入程序集（exe / dll）中，也可以位于名为<YOUR_APP>.exe.manifest的单独文件中。 这是唯一的方法，也许是唯一可以安全检查的