In this answer to a recent question, I was advised to "be wary of making every property in your domain model have public getters and setters. That can lead you to an anemic domain model." However I then encounter the problem that an entity with private setters, like this: public class Phrase { public int PhraseId { get; private set; } public string PhraseText { get; private s
在对最近一个问题的回答中,我被建议“谨防让你的领域模型中的每个属性都有公共的getter和setter,这可能导致你成为贫血的领域模型。” 然而,然后我遇到了这样一个问题:具有私有setter的实体,如下所示: public class Phrase { public int PhraseId { get; private set; } public string PhraseText { get; private set; } } 不能从视图到控制器使用JSON序列化(使用ASP.NET MVC)。 这是由于私人二传手。 你将
I have two web service calls, Method1() and Method2(). If a boolean variable is set to true, Method1() should be called first, then Method2(). If the boolean variable is set to false, only Method2() should be called. When I look at the timestamps of the xml files, I can see that request/response of Method1() have a newer timestamp than files for Method2(), which suggest that Method2 is calle
我有两个Web服务调用,Method1()和Method2()。 如果布尔变量设置为true,则应先调用Method1(),然后再调用Method2()。 如果布尔变量设置为false,则只应调用Method2()。 当我查看xml文件的时间戳时,可以看到Method1()的请求/响应比Method2()的文件有更新的时间戳,这表明Method2在Method1之前被调用。 Method2()被调用之前是否有办法等待Method1()完成? var client = new WebServiceClient();
I have a WCF service (.svc file) which is hosted in IIS and that's not RESTful. It has some web methods with input parameters. <%@ ServiceHost Language="C#" Debug="true" Service="MyNameSpace.MyService"%> Each web methods has an input parameter called sitename such as: List<string> GetAvailableList(string param1, string sitename); Now I'd need to log the input url and inpu
我有一个WCF服务(.svc文件),它托管在IIS中,并且不是RESTful。 它有一些带有输入参数的web方法。 <%@ ServiceHost Language="C#" Debug="true" Service="MyNameSpace.MyService"%> 每个Web方法都有一个名为sitename的输入参数,例如: List<string> GetAvailableList(string param1, string sitename); 现在我需要记录web方法的输入url和输入参数,而不必去那里并改变web方法的任何实现。 无论如何,就像A
if my web service has 5 methods, say method1(), method2(), method3(),method4() and method5(). and two clients a and b. then is it possible that client a only see method1() and method2(). and client b only see method 3,4 and 5. is it possible in webservice? if yes , then how? When you mean 'call' by 'see': yes. You could test the credentials of the user and accordingly gra
如果我的Web服务有5个方法,比如method1(),method2(),method3(),method4()和method5()。 和两个客户a和b。 那么是否有可能客户端只能看到method1()和method2()。 而客户端b只能看到方法3,4和5。 是否有可能在web服务? 如果是的话,那么如何? 当你用'see'表示'call'时:是的。 您可以测试用户的凭据并相应地授予或拒绝访问权限。 当你的意思是'发表元数据(MEX / WSDL)'
I'd like to create a game that has a platform, with various floors. Each floor has some buildings and objects on it that can be interacted with and has some way of getting to floors above it and/or below it. I need to have: Object(Model) Loading/Rendering, Input, Collision Detection and Picking. I'd also like to stick to .NET Langauges I have looked up many engines (both .NET native
我想创建一个有不同楼层平台的游戏。 每层楼都有一些建筑物和物体可以与之互动,并且有一些方法可以到达楼上和/或楼下的楼层。 我需要有:对象(模型)加载/渲染,输入,碰撞检测和选取。 我也想坚持.NET Langauges 我查了很多引擎(包括.NET native或wrapper),许多引擎都具有我需要的功能,而且更多的是我不需要的额外功能。 我已经看过Grahpics API,就像DirectX / OpenGL和其他基于这些的Grahpics API,但是我需要
I'm trying to learn about vectorization by studying simple C code compiled in gcc with -O3 optimization. More specifically, how well compilers vectorize. It is a personal journey towards being able to verify gcc -O3 performance with more complex computation. I understand that conventional wisdom is that compilers are better than people, but I never take such wisdom for granted. In my fir
我试图通过学习使用-O3优化编译成gcc的简单C代码来了解矢量化。 更具体地说,编译器的矢量化程度如何。 这是通过更复杂的计算来验证gcc -O3性能的个人旅程。 我明白,传统的观点认为编制者比人更好,但我从不认为这种看法是理所当然的。 然而,在我的第一个简单测试中,我发现gcc做出的一些选择非常奇怪,并且在优化方面非常严重地疏忽了。 我愿意假设编译器是有目的的,并且知道一些关于CPU的情况(在这种情况下是Intel i
I was trying to convert C code to MIPS assembly. There are these two following C code snippets. The problem is that my solution differs from the standard solution. Also, I don't understand the standard solution. I hoped, someone could explain me the two following mips assembly code snippets. First of all some additional information for the task. Only the following MIPS instructions are
我试图将C代码转换为MIPS汇编。 有以下两个C代码片段。 问题是我的解决方案与标准解决方案不同。 另外,我不了解标准解决方案。 我希望有人能向我解释下面两个mips汇编代码片断。 首先为该任务提供一些附加信息。 只允许使用以下MIPS指令: lw,add,beq,bne和j 。 寄存器: $ s3包含我 $ s4包含j $ s5包含k A是32位整数的阵列和A的初始地址在$ S6 $ t0和$ t1可用于存储临时变量 第一个是一个简单的do-whi
I've been working on an application that requires monitoring thread specific mouse activity ( WH_MOUSE ) on another process and encountered something very curious. After finding out that this is not possible via exclusively managed code if I don't want to use WH_MOUSE_LL and that I'd need a native DLL export to inject itself in the target process, I set out and created it in C++ acc
我一直在研究需要在另一个进程上监视线程特定鼠标活动( WH_MOUSE )的应用程序,并且遇到了一些非常好奇的事情。 如果我不想使用WH_MOUSE_LL ,并且我需要一个本地DLL导出来将自己注入到目标进程中,我发现通过独占托管代码无法实现这一点,所以我根据什么在C ++中设置并创建它我可以找到关于这个主题的分散文档,然后尝试使用它来挂钩记事本。 虽然根据GetLastWin32Error注入成功,但我没有得到有关鼠标事件的通知。 在几
We have two versions of a managed C++ assembly, one for x86 and one for x64. This assembly is called by a .net application complied for AnyCPU. We are deploying our code via a file copy install, and would like to continue to do so. Is it possible to use a Side-by-Side assembly manifest to loading a x86 or x64 assembly respectively when an application is dynamically selecting it's processo
我们有两个版本的托管C ++程序集,一个用于x86,一个用于x64。 该程序集由AnyCPU编译的.net应用程序调用。 我们正在通过文件复制安装部署我们的代码,并希望继续这样做。 当应用程序动态选择它的处理器体系结构时,是否可以使用并行程序集清单分别加载x86或x64程序集? 或者还有另一种方法可以在文件复制部署中完成此操作(例如,不使用GAC)? 我创建了一个简单的解决方案,它能够从编译为AnyCPU的可执行文件加载平台特
For instance, does the compiler know to translate string s = "test " + "this " + "function"; to string s = "test this function"; and thus avoid the performance hit with the string concatenation? Yes. This is guaranteed by the C# specification. It's in section 7.18 (of the C# 3.0 spec): Whenever an expression fulfills the requirements listed above, the expression is evaluated at comp
例如,编译器是否知道翻译 string s = "test " + "this " + "function"; 至 string s = "test this function"; 从而避免字符串连接的性能问题? 是。 这由C#规范保证。 它在7.18节(C#3.0规范)中: 只要表达式符合上述要求,表达式就会在编译时进行评估。 即使表达式是包含非常量结构的较大表达式的子表达式,情况也是如此。 (“上面列出的要求”包括应用于两个常量表达式的+运算符。) 另请参阅此问题。 只