C++: std::vector with space reserving for both ends

Just some thoughts: I wanted to erase x elements from the beginning of a std::vector with size n > x. Since a vector uses an array internally, this could be as easy as setting the pointer for vector.begin() to the index of the first element which is kept. But instead, erase shifts all elements in the array to that the first element actually starts at index 0, making the erase operation tak

C ++:std :: vector,为两端预留空间

只是有些想法: 我想从大小为n> x的std :: vector的开头擦除x元素。 由于矢量在内部使用数组,因此可以简单地将vector.begin()的指针设置为保留的第一个元素的索引。 但相反,擦除会将数组中的所有元素都移动到第一个元素实际从索引0开始,这使得擦除操作所花费的时间比它可能多得多。 此外,如果内部数组的有效'区域'仅由向量结构的一些开始和结束索引/指针来控制,那么也可以选择在第一个元素前面保留空间

Write concurrently vector<bool>

I know that is possible to read concurrently from a std::vector without "bad" consequences because this operation can be considered thread-safe. But the same cannot be said for writing operations. But, I am wondering if this is not always true, for example considering my particular scenario. I have a std::vector<bool> , where all the elements are initialized to false , and, g

同时写入矢量<bool>

我知道可以从std::vector同时读取而不会造成“坏”的后果,因为这个操作可以被认为是线程安全的。 但是写作操作也不能这样说。 但是,我想知道这是不是总是如此,例如考虑我的特殊情况。 我有一个std::vector<bool> ,其中所有元素都被初始化为false ,并且给定一个索引数组,我需要将这些元素的值(每个索引的vector[index] )从false更改为true 。 如果我为每个索引使用不同的线程(并且有可能某些索引具有相同的值

safety of writing a std::vector vs plain array

I've read on Stackoverflow that none of the STL containers are thread-safe for writing . But what does that mean in practice? Does it mean I should store writable data in plain arrays? I expect concurrent calls to std::vector::push_back(element) could lead to inconsistent data structures becaue it might entail resizing the vector. But what about a case like this, where resizing is not in

写一个std :: vector vs plain数组的安全性

我读过Stackoverflow, 没有一个STL容器对于编写而言是线程安全的 。 但是这在实践中意味着什么? 这是否意味着我应该在普通数组中存储可写数据? 我期望对std::vector::push_back(element)并发调用可能会导致不一致的数据结构,因为它可能需要调整向量的大小。 但是像这样的情况下,不涉及调整大小的情况: 1)使用数组: int data[n]; // initialize values here... #pragma omp parallel for for (int i = 0; i <

Is stl vector concurrent read thread

I am working on a application where huge number of threads are expected to iterate over set of string values and try to match it's own data with the data available in the list. I am looking for following use case: Vector is initialized with few elements of type std::string. (Lets say object name is strList). strList will get initialized at the time of application startup. All threads

是stl向量并发读取线程

我正在研究一个应用程序,在这个应用程序中,需要大量线程遍历字符串值集合,并尝试将它自己的数据与列表中可用的数据进行匹配。 我正在寻找以下用例: 向量被初始化为几个std :: string类型的元素。 (可以说对象名称是strList)。 strList将在应用程序启动时被初始化。 所有的线程都会迭代strList来查看它的值是否与strList的至少一个元素相匹配。 没有线程会尝试修改strList,它将被严格用作只读对象。 那么你能

how to make an application thread safe?

I thought thread safe, in particular, means it must satisfy the need for multiple threads to access the same shared data. But, it seems this definition is not enough. Can anyone please list out the things to be done or taken care of to make an application thread safe . If possible, give an answer with respect to C/C++ language. There are several ways in which a function can be thread safe.

如何使应用程序线程安全?

我认为线程安全,特别是,它意味着它必须满足多线程访问相同共享数据的需要。 但是,似乎这个定义还不够。 任何人都可以列出要做的事情或照顾,使应用程序线程安全 。 如果可能,请给出关于C / C ++语言的答案。 有几种方法可以使函数成为线程安全的。 它可以是可重入的 。 这意味着一个函数没有状态,并且不会触及任何全局或静态变量,因此可以同时从多个线程调用它。 这个术语来自允许一个线程进入该功能,而另一个

How to declare a vector of atomic in C++

I am intending to declare a vector of atomic variables to be used as counters in a multithreaded programme. Here is what I tried: #include <atomic> #include <vector> int main(void) { std::vector<std::atomic<int>> v_a; std::atomic<int> a_i(1); v_a.push_back(a_i); return 0; } And this is the annoyingly verbose error message of gcc 4.6.3: In file included f

如何在C ++中声明一个原子向量

我打算声明一个在多线程程序中用作计数器的原子变量向量。 这是我试过的: #include <atomic> #include <vector> int main(void) { std::vector<std::atomic<int>> v_a; std::atomic<int> a_i(1); v_a.push_back(a_i); return 0; } 这是gcc 4.6.3的烦人的详细错误信息: In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.6/x86_64-linux-gnu/./bits/c++allocator.h:34:0, from

Qt: Open links with target in default browser, without leaking memory

Searching through the Internet, I've come across so many ways, mostly nonfunctional, nonspecific, or partially functional, to do various things with QWebView and opening URLs. After much swearing and cursing, I've managed to get an example to do what I want, which is open normal links normally, and open anything that requests a new window in the external browser; however, there's a

Qt:在默认浏览器中打开目标链接,不会泄漏内存

通过互联网搜索,我遇到了很多方法,大部分是非功能性的,非特定性的或部分功能性的,用QWebView和打开URL来做各种事情。 经过大量的咒骂和诅咒之后,我设法得到了一个例子来做我想做的事情,这是正常打开的正常链接,并打开任何在外部浏览器中请求新窗口的内容; 然而,这有一个困难。 它泄漏内存,因为我制作了一堆额外的WebViews ,直到进程退出时才清理干净。 我怎样才能做到这一点,而不会泄漏内存? 请原谅我对Qt的

Are there any C99 compilers where with default settings

Many people frequently point out in discussions of the right-shift operator that the C standard explicitly states that the effect of right-shifting a negative number is implementation defined. I can understand the historical basis for that statement, given that C compilers have been used to generate code for a variety of platforms which do not use two's-complement arithmetic. All new-produc

是否有任何C99编译器在默认设置下

很多人经常在右移运算符的讨论中指出C标准明确指出负数移位的影响是实现定义的。 我可以理解该陈述的历史基础,因为已经使用C编译器为各种不使用二进制补码算法的平台生成代码。 然而,我所知道的所有新产品开发都集中在处理器上,这些处理器除了二进制补码之外没有任何类型的整数运算的固有支持。 如果代码希望以2的幂来执行一个有符号的有符号整数除法,并且它只会用于当前或未来的体系结构,那么是否存在任何未来的编译器

How to get values of a Matrix which are non zero

I am translating some matlab code to c++ using opencv. I want to get the values of a Matrix which satisfies a condition. I created a mask for this and when I apply it to the original Matrix I get the same size of the original matrix but with 0 values which are not there in the mask. But my question is how can I get only the values that are non-zero in the matrix and assign it to a different ma

如何获得非零矩阵的值

我正在使用opencv将一些matlab代码翻译成c ++。 我想获得满足条件的矩阵的值。 我为此创建了一个遮罩,当我将其应用到原始矩阵时,我获得了原始矩阵的相同大小,但有0个值不在遮罩中。 但我的问题是,我怎么才能得到矩阵中的非零值,并将其分配给不同的矩阵。 我的matlab代码是: for i= 1:size(no,1) mask= labels==i; op = orig(mask, :); //op only contains the values from the orig matrix which ar

64"start"

How can I link my program? I have a mid 2012 macbook pro which I recently upgraded to OSX 10.11 (El Capitan). In order to compile c++ programs I had to reinstall g++ which I did using brew. Now I am getting an error when trying to link my program. g++-6 -o hello hello.o Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "start", referenced from: implicit entry/start for main executable

64“开始”

我如何链接我的程序? 我有一个2012年中期的MacBook Pro,我最近升级到OSX 10.11(埃尔卡皮坦)。 为了编译c ++程序,我必须重新安装我使用brew创建的g ++。 现在,当我尝试链接我的程序时出现错误。 g ++ - 6 -o hello hello.o 体系结构x86_64的未定义符号:“start”,引用来自:隐式条目/ start for main可执行文件ld:找不到架构x86_64的符号collect2:错误:ld返回1退出状态 这是我的代码:hello.cpp #include &